BASSETERRE, St. Kitts, August 29TH 2011 (CUOPM) – Kittitian–born the Right Honourable Sir Charles Michael Dennis Byron who becomes President of the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) later this week is one of several justices actively participating in the public education programme to sensitize nationals exercises about the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ).
Sir Dennis will be underscoring the importance of a final appellate Court being sited in the Caribbean.
Appeal Court Judge Justice David Hayton will provide information about the institutional arrangements that underpin the Court, while Justice Adrian Saunders will give some indication of how the Court has been operating in practice (with examples of original and appellate jurisdiction judgments).
The three justices are on Nevis on Monday and will also participate in Tuesdays Media Workshop and Press Conference at the UWI Open Campus.
In the meeting with the St. Kitts and Nevis Bar Association Justice Jacob Wit will speak on his unique experiences at the CCJ as a civil law Judge and how this has helped to strengthen the CCJ Bench.
During the public lecture at the UWI Open Campus, Sir Dennis and Justices Wit, Saunders and Hayton will be joined by Judge Oxner
The vision of the CCJ is to provide for the Caribbean Community an accessible, fair, efficient, innovative and impartial justice system built on jurisprudence reflective of our history, values and traditions while maintaining an inspirational, independent institution worthy of emulation by the courts of the region and the trust and confidence of its people.
It was established on 14th February 2001 by the Agreement Establishing the Caribbean Court of Justice. The agreement was signed on that date by the CARICOM states of: Antigua & Barbuda; Barbados; Belize; Grenada; Guyana; Jamaica; St. Kitts & Nevis; St. Lucia; Suriname; and Trinidad & Tobago.
Two other states, Dominica and St. Vincent & The Grenadines, signed the agreement on 15 February 2003, bringing the total number of signatories to 12.
The Bahamas and Haiti, though full members of CARICOM, are not yet signatories, and because of its status as a British colony, Montserrat must await Instruments of Entrustment from the UK in order to ratify.
The Agreement Establishing the Caribbean Court of Justice came into force on 23 July 2003, and the CCJ was inaugurated on 16 April 2005 in Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago, the Seat of the Court.
In its appellate jurisdiction, the CCJ hears and determines appeals in both civil and criminal matters from common law courts within the jurisdictions of Member States of the Community and which are parties to the Agreement Establishing the CCJ.
In its appellate jurisdiction, the CCJ is the highest municipal court in the region for states which accede to its appellate jurisdiction. In its original jurisdiction, the CCJ discharges the functions of an international tribunal, applying rules of international law in respect of the interpretation and application of the Treaty of Chaguaramas.
In this regard, the CCJ functions like the European Court of Justice, the European Court of First Instance, the Andean Court of Justice of COMESA and the International Court of Justice.
In short, the CCJ is a hybrid institution – a municipal court of last resort and an international court with compulsory and exclusive jurisdiction in respect of the interpretation and application of the Treaty of Chaguaramas.
There is still some lingering opposition to the CCJ. Surveys in some Member States, however, have showed as many as 80% of the persons surveyed supported the Court.
In some jurisdictions, while there is little opposition to the Court in its original jurisdiction, there is more opposition to it in its appellate jurisdiction.
Opposition to the CCJ was informed by various considerations, such as suspicion of the unknown and professional resistance to change. Some members of the legal fraternity also entertained reservations about the ability and willingness of Member States of the Caribbean Community to provide adequate funding for the Court on a sustainable basis.
Other stakeholders question the likelihood of the CCJ attracting to its benches judges of the required expertise and legal erudition to inspire confidence among members of the legal community and litigants generally.
All of these considerations have been addressed. Defenders of the Court perceive of this institution as completing the independence of Commonwealth Caribbean States. Other supporters of the Court consider that an indigenous Court consisting of regional judges is best suited to pronounce on issues of regional importance and, in so doing, contribute to the development of a regional jurisprudence.
*************************
DISCLAIMER
This article was posted in its entirety as received by SKNVibes.com. This media house does not correct any spelling or grammatical error within press releases and commentaries. The views expressed therein are not necessarily those of SKNVibes.com, its sponsors or advertisers
