Comment: Retry The Accused.

Comment: It is ironic how the police have no evidence but yet still believe their own. Stolen items can be planted. They cannot retrieve any bullets from the so-called assailants but they have bullets from prior target practice. They have a picture of the young man in a bullet proof vest (WOW) big deal. This does not make him a criminal if you have no proof he did anything wrong. I guess they think his mother put holes in the pants along with rotting flesh. Not very good detective work. SOMETHING FISHY

Comment: Questions continued Of there is a pic of this young man in bullet proof vest and a gun, why is it not here? What are the items of evidentiary significance? Where is the gun that the young man use to fire upon the police?Why did it take days for the press conference? Crime in St. Kitts is appalling but we cannot clean it up by any means necessary because a police state can turn out to be more criminal than what we have. As much as we are fed-up with the crime, even the alleged have rights.

Comment: great work sknvibes i am sorry you did not dig deeper.am happy you picked up the inconsistancy of the info the family gave out and even what they said rogers gave them. the first news topic mention about this fellow was hiding in the bushes and he saw what happen, that will tell me rogers and company was in the area. his mom asked her son where he was going so early and warned him telling him that police and soldiers were in sandy point a lot harassing sandy point people. what a statement

Comment: I wasn't there so I can't say for sure. I don't know the guy who got shot or the one who shot him. But there are questions on both sides. 1. Where are the dark clothes? Red shirt and blue jeans aren't dark clothes. 2. Where are the spent shells? It does not matter how bad the topography, if you want to prove it was a justified shoot, then you find the spent shells. 3. And why did the victim's family claim that the ambulance came at 10 when it would be so easy to verify?

Comment: @well well u didn't have to answer y de hell u don't make me back off. The army story match up? They story ain't match up even a fool cud c that a guest that should consider u to b a fool then and if a cud testify trust me I wud. Mayb u a cop or u just a hater. Think and read between the lines and read and understand. Read it again and analyze.

Comment: The stories on both side sound bogus. 1)I can understand the dark clothes by the officers bcuz at that time of day it will appear to be dark. 2)The guys previous story with the time he made the call is conflicting. 3)The army need to publish the evidence so to satisfy our hunger for answers. 4)Obvious the officers didnt leave him bcuz they was able to direct the ambulance to him the fren cudnt tell them that. 5)y burn down the shacks

Comment: The Bible say no sin goes unpunished.Both stories not adding up but why they didn't shoot him in he head since that it is up in the mountain, dead man tells no tale. what about the two brothers who were killed a few years ago in sandy point? If you worship a gun and not the true and living God such things as these is punishment for taking others lives.

Comment: did the army found a gun on Ratty if he was shotting at them where is the gun

Comment: SOMETHINGS NOT RIGHT ABOUT THIS STORY, WHAT HAPPEN TO THE DARK CLOTHING THE THREE GUYS WERE WEARING AS THE SOLDIER SAID...........SOMETHING JUST NOT RIGHT I THINK SUTTON IS HIDING SOMETHING AND NOT BEEN TRUTHFUL. IF HE WAS ONE WEARING DARK COLOURED CLOTHING HOW COME THERE'S A PHOTO OF A BRIGHT RED SHIRT AND A BLUE JEAN